S. 23 Passes the Senate 95-5

The reality of Patent Reform took one huge step forward yesterday when the U.S. Senate passed S. 23 by a vote of 95-5.  Only the senators who have been trying to stop the bill voted against it:  Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Mike Crapo (R-ID), John Ensign (R-NV), and James Risch (R-ID).

As expected, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) (what’s he going to do now, retire?), who takes personal ownership of the bill and the patent reform initiative, praised the passage.  He noted that similar bills have been pending for the last three congresses and that there had been eight hearings, hundreds of meetings, and dozens of briefings.  Likewise, the White House praised the passage and urged the House to pass the bill so that it can become law.  AIPLA also issued a statement commending the Senate for passing S. 23.

House of Representatives

The drama now shifts to the U.S. House of Representatives.  Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) has indicated that he will introduce a bill later this month.  There are already hearings planned to review the matter.  For example, tomorrow the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet will hold a hearing on “Review of Recent Judicial Decisions on Patent Law.”  Professor Dennis Crouch of Patently-O has indicated that he will present testimony.

Barring a huge crisis, like a financial collapse or the like, or a huge political controversy like health care reform, it seems that patent reform is more likely in 2011 that at any time since it has been introduced.  The biggest criticism, and I’m not sure that it’s warranted, that continues to be raised regarding S. 23 is that it hurts little guy and favors big corporations.  The argument goes that big corporations can afford to file massive numbers of patent applications on new ideas (although ideas are not patentable), while the little guy needs to raise capital and make sure he has a solid invention before he can afford to file.  A similar argument is made regarding start-ups and venture capitalists.  This was the impetus behind Sen. Feinstein’s proposed amendment last week.

One unknown in the debate yet is the role that the Tea Party will play.  After the 2010 election, there are vastly more Tea Party members in the House than in the Senate.  The Tea Party is supposed to be attuned to the little guy, to Main Street as opposed to Pennsylvania Avenue or even Wall Street.  It is yet unknown what roll the Tea Party will play.  This question was also raised here.

The bottom line is that it is definitely time for all interested parties, whether you favor or oppose the bill, to contact your representative and tell them how they should vote on Patent Reform.

About these ads

7 Responses to “S. 23 Passes the Senate 95-5”

  1. Copyright Litigation Says:

    There is no companion bill in the House at present, but Republican Representative Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has said he is close to completing a draft.

    Under the Senate bill, the United States would grant precedence to the first inventor to file a patent application, rather than requiring patent office examiners to decide who was first to produce an invention.

  2. General Global Week in Review 14 March 2011 from IP Think Tank Says:

    [...] passes S. 23 (95-5) (Patent Docs) (IPBiz) (IP Whiteboard) (Patent Docs) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Blawg IT) (Patents Post-Grant) (Patent Law Practice [...]

  3. China Update 19 March 2011 from IP Think Tank / 中国知识产权动向,2011年3月19来自IP Think Tank Says:

    [...] 美国参议院通过S.23专利改革法案  (Patent Docs) (IPBiz) (IP Whiteboard) (Patent Docs) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Blawg IT) (Patents Post-Grant) (Patent Law Practice [...]

  4. House Judiciary Committee Passes Patent Reform Bill « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    [...] the grace period remain in the bill.  If the House passes the bill, it must be reconciled with the Senate bill in a conference committee.  The final bill would then need to be re-passed by both houses of [...]

  5. Campaign Against America Invents Act Intensifies « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    [...] that they are a bit late to the game considering that the Patent Reform bill pending in Congress passed the Senate 95-5 in March and by a similar huge majority passed the House Judiciary Committee in April, but opposition to the [...]

  6. Amendments to America Invents Act « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    [...] bill had a ton of momentum when it resoundingly passed the Senate in March.  Happily, Congress has now slowed it down a bit and will hopefully seriously consider all of the [...]

  7. Patent Reform Notes « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    [...] Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-NV) push for cloture on patent reform and the Senate’s previous 95-5 approval vote, and the more pressing budgetary issues facing the country, passage of H.R. 1249 seems [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56 other followers

%d bloggers like this: