Senate Debate on Patent Reform Continues

Yesterday, the Senate continued its debate on patent reform bill S. 23.  Several amendments were approved, including the authorization of three more satellite offices over the next three years, the creation of an ombudsman to assist small businesses with patenting, a requirement that the PTO prioritize examination of applications “important to the national economy competitiveness” such as green or clean energy technology, and authorization for the PTO to charge small entity fees for Track I prioritized examination.

First-to-Invent v. First-to-File

The real fight, however, seems to be looming over the provision changing the US from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system.  Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) offered an amendment to remove the provision from the bill that would change the US system.  The amendment was co-sponsored by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Mike Crapo (R-ID), John Ensign (R-NV), James Risch (R-ID), and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).  It is interesting to note that the 6 co-sponsors represent three states, all within the same geographic region.

Proponents of the first-to-invent system essentially argue that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.  The US is an innovative leader with its first-to-invent system; there is simply no need for a change.  The change would harm small inventors, start-ups, and small businesses who will be forced to file patent applications before their inventions are ready.  If the change is made, the PTO will be flooded with half-baked inventions.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) is the strongest proponent of changing to a first-to-file system.  He argued that the change is necessary to eliminate confusion and inefficiency in the patent system.  The change would add certainty and spur investment, thereby growing businesses and creating jobs.

Sen. Leahy has also expressed frustration with the slowness with which the Senate is proceeding on S. 23.  Most others would argue that there still hasn’t been adequate input and testimony from all concerned parties.  In fact, this is virtually the first time the entire Senate has debated patent reform during the latest iteration.

Debate on the bill is expected to continue today.

UPDATEThe Senate has voted 87-13 to kill the First-to-File Amendment.

About these ads

3 Responses to “Senate Debate on Patent Reform Continues”

  1. Patent Litigation Says:

    Here is a similar story

    U.S. Senate Democrats on Friday pushed for a vote next week on their new proposal to trim $6 billion from spending while protecting President Barack Obama’s healthcare overhaul and other priorities.

    Democrats offered their measure as an alternative to a bill passed by the Republican-led House of Representatives last month that would cut about $61 billion in spending. Republicans immediately rejected the Democrats’ offer as being woefully inadequate.

  2. General Global Week in Review 7 March 2011 from IP Think Tank Says:

    [...] debate (Patentology) (Inventive Step) (IPBiz) (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) [...]

  3. China Update 12 March 2011 from IP Think Tank / 中国知识产权动向,2011年3月12日来自IP Think Tank Says:

    [...] (Patentology) (Inventive Step) (IPBiz) (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56 other followers

%d bloggers like this: