http://inventivestep.net/2012/01/31/patent-mass-aggregators/2012-01-31T15:29:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/26/supplemental-examination-reexamination/2012-01-26T15:12:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/23/the-importance-of-inventorship/2012-01-23T19:13:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/18/track-i-accelerated-examination/2012-01-18T14:07:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/12/virginia-state-bar-section-on-intellectual-property-law-law-student-writing-competition-2/2012-01-12T21:14:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/11/pto-to-open-detroit-satellite-office-by-july/2012-01-11T16:37:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/11/patent-drawings/2012-01-11T16:21:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/05/proposed-rule-for-third-party-prior-art-submissions/2012-01-05T21:20:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2012/01/03/rce-filing-to-get-prioritized-examination/2012-01-03T18:06:56+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/12/19/tips-on-transitioning-to-first-to-file/2011-12-19T14:55:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/12/14/america-invents-act-first-to-file-transition/2011-12-16T00:41:45+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/12/08/cert-petition-in-gene-patent-case/2011-12-08T22:50:56+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/12/02/litigation-update/2011-12-02T14:42:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/11/29/searching-for-prior-art/2011-11-29T14:53:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/11/17/america-invents-act-changes-to-section-103/2011-11-17T17:32:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/11/11/dumont-withdraws-richard-taranto-is-next-nominee/2011-11-11T13:00:04+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/11/08/evan-wallach-unanimously-confirmed-to-federal-circuit/2011-11-08T18:03:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/11/02/commissioner-stoll-to-retire-to-be-replaced-by-deputy-commissioner-focarino/2011-11-02T19:39:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/31/provisional-patent-applications-2/2011-10-31T15:27:13+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/26/design-patents-3/2011-10-26T14:10:19+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/20/pto-numbers-at-end-of-fy2011/2011-10-20T14:04:58+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/18/patentable-subject-matter-at-the-supreme-court/2011-10-18T14:39:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/12/america-invents-act-new-section-102/2011-10-12T14:25:08+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/10/judiciary-committee-approves-judge-wallach/2011-10-10T15:12:19+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/06/discussion-of-supreme-courts-patent-jurisprudence-at-scotusblog/2011-10-06T13:11:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/10/03/patent-deadlines/2011-10-03T15:40:02+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/27/america-invents-act-other-provisions-in-effect-now/2011-09-27T13:16:39+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/23/america-invents-act-pto-fees/2011-09-23T15:02:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/21/book-review-great-patents/2011-09-21T20:25:54+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/21/america-invents-act-prior-use-defense/2011-10-26T14:01:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/15/federal-circuit-holds-internet-monetization-method-is-patent-eligible/2011-09-25T00:11:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/15/enactment-of-patent-reform-act/2011-11-16T02:54:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/12/evan-wallach-confirmation-hearing/2011-09-12T15:36:04+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/09/senate-passes-house-version-of-patent-reform/2011-09-09T13:00:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/08/patent-reform-passage-appears-imminent/2011-09-08T13:48:34+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/07/house-patent-reform-bill-clears-hurdle-in-senate/2011-09-07T13:52:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/09/06/all-eyes-on-senate-as-it-votes-on-patent-reform/2011-09-07T00:45:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/31/immunization-methods-are-patent-eligible/2011-09-01T01:59:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/31/joint-inventors/2011-08-31T13:04:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/23/2496/2011-08-26T15:13:02+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/22/federal-circuit-rules-beauregard-claims-are-unpatentable/2011-08-23T13:43:43+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/17/pto-issues-u-s-patent-no-8000000/2011-08-17T17:10:39+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/15/patent-reform-notes/2011-08-15T17:32:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/08/03/senate-to-take-up-house-patent-reform-bill-after-august-recess/2011-08-07T08:03:40+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/29/federal-circuit-reverses-district-court-in-gene-patent-case/2011-08-01T12:51:58+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/29/evan-wallach-nominated-to-federal-circuit/2011-07-29T15:10:35+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/28/federal-circuit-judges-daniel-friedman-and-glenn-archer-have-died/2011-07-28T13:43:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/25/judge-arthur-j-gajarsa-to-take-senior-status/2011-07-26T06:58:32+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/22/pto-to-match-materiality-standard-to-therasense/2011-07-25T12:58:46+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/21/considerations-about-applying-for-a-patent/2011-07-22T07:53:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/14/pto-numbers-after-third-quarter-of-fy2011/2011-07-14T13:42:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/11/judge-michel-on-patent-reform/2011-07-14T04:58:47+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/07/06/examiner-interviews/2011-07-07T11:17:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/29/supreme-court-to-hear-more-patent-cases-in-october-2011-term/2011-06-29T12:59:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/24/house-passes-h-r-1249/2011-07-06T16:48:59+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/20/if-fee-diversion-continues-kill-the-bill/2011-06-20T16:28:43+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/14/amendments-to-america-invents-act/2011-06-15T07:32:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/09/supreme-court-affirms-clear-and-convincing-standard/2011-06-09T16:03:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/08/opposition-to-patent-reform-bill-from-congress/2011-06-08T15:42:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/08/references-in-obviousness-rejections-must-be-analogous-art/2011-06-08T14:01:48+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/06/02/patent-prosecution-lessons/2011-06-02T15:10:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/contact-2/2011-06-01T13:29:26+00:00weekly0.6http://inventivestep.net/2011/06/01/supreme-court-willful-blindness-knowledge/2011-06-01T13:16:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/05/31/how-will-the-pto-respond-to-therasense/2011-05-31T14:07:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/05/26/federal-circuit-tightens-inequitable-conduct-standards/2011-05-26T15:42:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/05/23/campaign-against-america-invents-act-intensifies/2011-08-23T04:21:11+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/05/17/pto-expands-pre-office-action-interview-program/2011-06-13T09:12:54+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/05/11/patent-prosecution-highway/2011-05-11T15:46:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/05/05/patent-applications-to-create-defensive-prior-art/2011-05-05T13:15:34+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/29/the-importance-of-keeping-the-infringer-in-mind-when-preparing-patent-claims/2011-05-24T05:52:19+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/25/guest-post-david-boundy-defeat-the-america-invents-act/2011-05-24T13:00:28+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/25/congress-creates-pto-budget-crisis/2011-04-25T14:54:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/20/thoughts-on-microsoft-v-i4i/2011-04-21T08:32:57+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/15/fy2011-pto-numbers-pto-explanation/2011-04-15T16:09:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/15/grace-period-in-america-invents-act/2011-04-20T02:10:51+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/15/house-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-bill/2011-06-06T13:19:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/13/pto-fy2011-numbers-so-far/2011-04-13T14:26:52+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/13/congress-continues-to-play-politics-with-pto-appropriations/2011-04-13T13:26:59+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/12/managers-amendment-for-h-r-1249/2011-04-12T18:18:14+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/08/if-government-shuts-down-pto-to-remain-open-through-april-18/2011-04-08T13:47:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/07/patent-issues-for-foreign-products/2011-04-13T17:25:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/05/jimmie-reyna-confirmed-to-federal-circuit/2011-04-06T08:37:35+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/04/final-rule-on-track-i-examination/2011-04-05T08:32:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/04/01/more-on-patent-reform/2011-04-09T09:53:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/31/america-invents-act-introduced-in-house/2011-03-31T17:47:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/28/district-court-holds-false-marking-statute-is-constitutional/2011-03-30T09:38:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/25/house-to-take-up-patent-reform-next-week/2011-03-28T08:02:45+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/22/burden-of-proof-for-patent-challenges/2011-03-23T08:13:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/15/false-marking-must-be-pled-with-particularity/2011-03-21T05:36:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/14/federal-circuit-nomination-update-2/2011-03-15T08:38:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/09/s-23-passes-the-senate-95-5/2011-03-14T05:53:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/08/senate-votes-to-end-debate-on-patent-reform-bill/2011-03-09T07:27:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/07/senate-nearing-vote-on-patent-reform/2011-03-07T18:19:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/03/senate-debate-on-patent-reform-continues/2011-03-05T07:45:43+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/02/senate-amendments-to-s-23/2011-03-03T06:57:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/03/01/s-23-and-secret-prior-art/2011-03-01T16:14:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/28/the-debate-over-proposed-changes-to-first-to-invent-and-the-one-year-grace-period/2011-03-01T06:11:02+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/25/federal-court-holds-false-marking-statute-unconstitutional/2011-02-25T14:16:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/22/patent-reform-update-3/2011-02-23T06:35:08+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/22/here-we-go-again/2011-02-22T16:24:04+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/14/house-subcommittee-hearing-on-patent-reform/2011-02-15T05:30:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/10/jimmie-reyna-to-finally-get-confirmation-hearing/2011-02-10T19:22:14+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/07/pto-proposes-rules-for-track-i-accelerated-examination/2011-02-07T17:54:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/04/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-bill-2/2011-02-04T14:00:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/02/03/judiciary-committee-to-consider-patent-reform-bill/2011-02-03T15:20:03+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/28/design-patents-2/2011-01-28T13:53:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/26/another-argument-that-the-false-marking-statute-is-unconstitutional/2011-01-26T15:35:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/21/patent-reform-2011/2011-01-21T18:10:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/07/dumont-and-reyna-renominated-to-federal-circuit/2011-01-17T15:35:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/17/uspto-issues-record-number-of-patents/2011-01-17T15:31:40+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/14/virginia-state-bar-section-on-intellectual-property-law-law-student-writing-competition/2011-02-02T10:09:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/13/patent-reform-in-the-112th-congress/2011-01-13T14:25:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/10/patent-application-costs/2011-01-10T15:02:57+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2011/01/04/patent-pending-marking/2011-01-04T14:46:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/12/21/judge-omalley-to-be-confirmed-to-federal-circuit/2011-01-05T06:00:23+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/12/17/federal-circuit-reconfirms-patentability-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/2010-12-17T19:18:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/12/17/uspto-officially-announces-detroit-regional-office/2010-12-17T14:19:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/12/13/applying-for-a-patent/2010-12-13T14:51:48+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/12/08/pto-implements-24-month-provisional-program/2010-12-08T20:49:56+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/12/08/commissioner-stoll-speaks-at-gripla-holiday-party/2010-12-08T16:17:13+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/30/supreme-court-to-review-presumption-of-validity/2010-11-30T17:52:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/22/pre-appeal-brief-conferences/2010-11-22T19:25:28+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/16/pto-proposes-new-appeal-rules/2010-11-16T14:51:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/15/patent-reform-in-the-lame-duck-congress/2010-11-15T16:14:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/09/federal-circuit-limits-prosecution-laches-defense/2010-11-09T21:39:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/09/inequitable-conduct-article/2010-11-09T20:43:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/08/two-en-banc-arguments-at-federal-circuit-this-week/2010-11-08T18:01:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/11/01/justice-department-files-brief-arguing-that-isolated-genes-are-not-patentable/2010-11-01T15:29:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/27/federal-circuit-caseload-fy2010/2010-10-28T14:39:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/25/senate-gridlocked-on-judicial-nominations/2010-10-25T16:23:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/15/end-of-fy2010-pto-numbers/2010-10-15T13:10:13+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/12/supreme-court-to-hear-induced-infringement-case/2010-10-12T15:39:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/12/should-you-apply-for-a-patent/2010-10-12T12:46:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/11/pto-to-change-examination-quality-metrics/2010-10-11T15:43:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/10/01/jimmie-reyna-nominated-to-federal-circuit/2010-10-01T12:50:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/09/29/how-to-keep-patent-costs-down-and-to-get-better-patents/2010-09-29T12:41:25+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/09/16/patent-reform-not-dead-yet/2010-09-16T13:27:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/09/15/when-is-the-preamble-a-limitation-of-the-claim/2010-09-15T17:20:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/09/09/kappos-says-pto-making-progress-on-backlog/2010-09-09T12:53:52+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/09/08/pto-data-visualization-center/2010-09-08T23:41:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/09/03/what-joint-inventors-need-to-know/2010-09-03T15:24:57+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/08/30/another-means-plus-function-opinion/2010-08-30T16:12:18+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/08/27/another-new-patent-reform-bill-is-introduced-in-the-house/2010-09-23T12:34:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/08/24/organizations-provide-comments-on-proposed-three-tier-application-system/2010-08-24T15:54:35+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/26/federal-circuit-nomination-update/2010-08-11T12:55:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/08/09/are-you-a-small-entity/2010-08-09T13:33:04+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/08/05/judge-dyks-view-on-the-patentability-of-isolated-genes-and-dna/2010-08-05T13:52:35+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/08/03/informing-someone-of-the-inherent-property-of-a-method-is-not-patentable/2010-08-03T15:11:04+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/29/house-passes-supplemental-pto-funding-bill/2010-07-29T14:15:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/28/pto-interim-guidance-on-bilski/2010-07-29T15:27:43+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/20/bilski-podcast/2010-07-20T18:04:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/19/plaintiffs-begin-appellate-fight-over-gene-patents/2011-03-05T19:38:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/16/provisional-patent-applications/2010-07-16T13:31:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/13/conception-and-reduction-to-practice/2010-07-13T13:03:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/08/federal-circuit-expands-secret-prior-art/2010-07-09T20:09:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/07/07/pto-reaction-to-bilski/2010-07-07T14:43:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/30/bilski-reaction/2010-06-30T19:27:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/28/bilski/2010-06-29T00:17:59+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/21/where-is-bilski/2010-06-21T16:05:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/20/usto-seeking-changes-in-examiner-performance-standards/2010-06-20T20:05:40+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/11/false-marking-case-update/2010-06-11T14:44:23+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/08/federal-register-notice-on-three-track-examination/2010-08-07T20:29:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/04/more-on-ptos-proposed-three-track-system/2010-06-04T13:15:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/03/wsj-patent-office-considering-three-track-patent-application-system/2010-06-03T16:36:48+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/06/01/former-chief-judge-h-robert-mayer-to-take-senior-status/2010-06-01T19:26:56+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/28/when-making-accusations-of-infringement-be-ready-to-assert-patent/2010-05-29T01:11:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/24/reducing-patent-pendency-the-pto-responds/2010-05-24T19:52:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/21/pto-expands-application-acceleration-program/2010-05-21T13:19:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/19/house-introduces-pto-fee-bill/2010-05-19T13:37:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/17/contempt-proceedings-or-new-infringement-trial/2010-06-16T08:48:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/13/chief-judge-michel-fellow-citizens-be-on-guard/2011-03-13T01:59:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/11/reducing-patent-pendency/2010-05-31T22:49:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/06/house-judiciary-committee-is-less-than-enamored-with-senate-managers-amendment/2010-05-06T13:15:56+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/05/05/pto-issuing-many-more-patents-in-2010/2010-05-05T15:36:04+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/28/another-bad-inequitable-conduct-decision/2010-04-29T17:10:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/27/report-patent-reform-passage-near-in-senate/2010-04-27T14:23:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/26/federal-circuit-to-hear-inequitable-conduct-case-en-banc/2010-04-26T19:54:39+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/21/guest-post-david-boundy-patent-reform-that-hurts-small-inventors-and-small-businesses/2010-05-23T03:16:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/21/department-of-commerce-supports-patent-reform/2010-04-21T13:50:09+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/19/prior-art-searches/2010-05-03T14:41:03+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/15/edward-dumont-nominated-to-federal-circuit/2010-04-15T13:11:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/09/justice-stevens-to-retire-from-supreme-court/2010-04-09T17:26:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/07/pto-launches-ombudsman-program/2010-04-17T14:54:54+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/04/05/pto-proposes-to-extend-provisional-applications-to-24-months/2010-04-05T13:41:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/30/gene-patents-declared-invalid-for-now/2010-03-30T14:37:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/29/despite-low-participation-pto-set-to-expand-peer-to-patent-program/2010-04-19T13:32:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/25/federal-circuit-disregards-claim-preamble-in-holding-claim-invalid-as-anticipated/2010-04-30T17:37:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/22/federal-circuit-holds-that-patent-act-includes-separate-written-description-requirement/2010-04-02T15:35:23+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/19/new-paper-suggests-cooperative-patent-prosecution/2010-03-19T18:15:47+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/17/request-for-en-banc-rehearing-on-induced-infringement/2010-03-18T17:26:25+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/17/another-federal-circuit-opinion-on-the-dangers-of-late-application-filing/2010-03-17T21:58:40+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/12/another-bill-impacting-patent-reform/2010-03-12T14:53:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/11/kathleen-omalley-officially-nominated-to-federal-circuit/2010-03-11T15:42:13+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/05/kathleen-omalley-next-federal-circuit-judge/2010-03-05T18:27:39+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/05/more-on-senate-reform-bill/2010-03-05T17:40:25+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/04/senate-releases-managers-amendment-on-patent-reform/2010-03-04T22:03:47+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/03/04/how-not-to-work-with-your-patent-attorney/2010-04-01T22:35:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/02/25/federal-circuit-provides-more-guidance-on-design-patents/2010-09-03T01:55:59+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/02/22/more-opposition-to-patent-reform/2010-03-16T02:35:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/02/17/international-pct-filings-dropped-in-2009/2010-03-10T17:08:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/02/11/indirect-patent-infringement/2010-02-24T01:44:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/02/04/patent-reform-legislation-update/2010-02-20T03:35:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/02/02/obamas-fy2011-pto-budget/2010-02-02T14:17:57+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/28/pto-bpai-roundtable/2010-02-24T22:29:14+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/22/kappos-on-pto-budget-situation/2010-02-12T20:55:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/20/design-patents/2010-01-27T19:24:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/15/virginia-state-bar-intellectual-property-law-section-student-writing-competition/2010-01-15T19:16:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/08/patent-term-adjustment/2010-02-01T02:00:45+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/06/pto-responds-in-gene-patent-saga/2010-01-14T20:02:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/06/federal-circuit-interprets-false-marking-statute/2010-01-25T11:47:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/05/using-patent-applications-defensively/2010-02-14T01:24:11+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2010/01/04/new-bpai-rules-raised-again/2011-03-11T01:08:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/22/injunction-against-microsoft-word-affirmed/2010-01-13T11:40:03+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/21/federal-circuit-finishes-off-point-of-novelty-test/2010-01-11T23:18:48+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/16/means-plus-function-claiming-expert-opinions/2009-12-31T08:07:23+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/08/is-there-any-limit-left-on-declaratory-judgment-jurisdiction/2009-12-08T20:33:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/07/does-the-patent-act-include-a-written-description-requirement-separate-from-the-enablement-requirement/2010-01-02T08:34:49+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/03/federal-circuit-uses-ksrs-common-sense-test-to-affirm-invalidity/2010-01-02T08:46:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/12/02/uspto-annual-performance-report/2009-12-02T19:25:18+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/23/federal-circuit-chief-judge-michel-to-retire/2009-11-23T17:57:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/16/final-federal-circuit-order-in-pto-rules-case/2009-11-16T16:18:11+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/12/impressions-of-bilski-argument/2009-11-12T19:48:55+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/09/handicapping-bilski/2009-11-09T17:50:47+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/09/kappos-announces-new-initiative-to-speed-examination-for-small-entities/2009-11-09T17:41:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/05/should-you-file-a-patent-application-now-or-can-you-wait/2009-11-06T14:20:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/11/03/district-court-denies-motions-to-dismiss-in-gene-patent-case/2009-11-03T19:27:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/30/mayo-asks-supreme-court-to-review-another-patentable-subject-matter-case/2009-10-30T15:13:46+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/22/new-administration-seeks-to-further-limit-rce-filings/2009-10-22T12:35:45+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/19/republican-senators-have-concerns-about-post-grant-review/2009-10-19T15:39:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/15/microsoft-asks-federal-circuit-to-reconsider-the-presumption-of-validity/2010-03-03T11:03:51+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/09/continuation-claim-limit-rules-are-officially-dead/2010-02-25T00:00:03+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/07/secretary-locke-pushes-for-action-on-patent-reform-increase-in-pto-fees/2009-10-07T15:18:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/05/kappos-drops-out-of-the-chopper-shooting/2009-10-05T17:04:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/05/patent-reform-update-2/2009-10-05T17:03:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/10/01/changes-to-the-count-system/2010-05-23T05:41:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/28/bpai-appeal-load-out-of-control/2009-10-23T02:00:40+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/28/ptos-bilski-brief/2009-09-28T13:12:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/23/upcoming-event-patentable-subject-matter-debate/2009-09-23T16:48:28+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/23/patent-auctions/2010-02-25T21:39:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/22/companies-express-concerns-with-post-grant-opposition/2009-09-22T13:42:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/17/federal-circuit-reverses-invalidity-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/2009-09-17T13:51:52+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/15/kappos-sets-goals-for-new-pto-administration/2009-09-19T00:53:54+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/11/federal-circuit-vacates-damage-award-against-microsoft/2009-09-11T17:15:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/10/accelerated-examination/2009-09-24T21:40:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/03/amicus-briefs-supporting-plaintiffs-in-gene-patent-case/2009-09-03T15:59:08+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/02/aclu-moves-for-summary-judgment-in-gene-patent-case/2009-09-02T18:46:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/09/01/pto-interim-guidelines-on-patentable-subject-matter/2009-09-01T14:03:12+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/28/should-obviousness-be-determined-by-the-court-or-by-the-jury/2009-08-28T13:56:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/26/director-kappos-seeks-to-shift-examiner-rejection-philosophy/2009-08-26T14:23:48+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/24/en-banc-federal-circuit-to-review-written-description-requirement/2009-09-10T07:14:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/20/culture-at-pto-responsible-for-rising-rejection-rate/2009-08-20T15:54:52+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/19/federal-circuit-holds-271f-does-not-apply-to-method-claims/2009-08-19T17:53:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/19/news-update/2009-08-19T14:20:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/06/petitioners-brief-in-bilski/2010-02-19T15:05:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/06/update-senate-judiciary-committee-approves-kappos-nomination/2009-08-06T15:10:39+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/05/inequitable-conduct-defense-requires-that-specific-facts-regarding-circumstances-and-intent-to-deceive-must-be-included-in-pleadings/2009-08-05T14:45:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/08/04/bpai-reverses-rejection-of-metabolite-claim/2009-08-04T14:00:11+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/29/kappos-confirmation-hearing/2009-07-29T17:47:20+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/27/stay-requested-in-pto-rules-litigation/2009-07-27T15:52:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/23/kappos-confirmation-hearing-set-for-next-week/2009-07-23T13:54:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/21/patent-reform-update-analysis-of-administrative-challenges/2009-07-21T14:27:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/20/pto-inter-partes-reexamination-may-give-insight-on-post-grant-oppositions/2010-02-05T01:26:02+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/14/pto-puts-peer-to-patent-program-on-hiatus/2009-07-14T17:12:26+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/13/another-court-invalidates-computer-aided-method-claims/2009-07-13T15:34:32+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/13/court-dismisses-patent-marking-lawsuit/2009-07-13T15:31:19+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/10/pto-rules-litigation-schedule/2009-07-10T13:13:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/10/nicholas-godici-to-aid-pto-in-transition-to-new-director/2009-07-10T13:09:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/08/house-passes-bill-shifting-pto-revenue/2009-07-08T15:31:29+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/06/federal-circuit-to-hear-pto-rules-appeal-en-banc/2009-07-06T21:07:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/07/02/jury-awards-johnson-johnson-subsidiary-1-67-billion/2009-07-02T13:32:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/25/congress-attempts-to-aid-pto-in-its-budget-crisis/2009-06-25T12:50:46+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/24/bilski-and-beyond-changing-ip-for-the-information-age/2010-06-27T02:11:39+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/24/ppac-meeting-summary/2009-06-24T15:34:09+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/22/david-kappos-nominated-to-direct-pto/2009-06-24T06:20:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/17/update-debate-on-gene-patenting-continues/2009-06-17T13:26:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/16/looming-crisis-at-bpai/2009-06-16T15:24:19+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/11/guest-post-at-huliq-com/2009-06-11T18:44:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/04/entire-federal-circuit-hears-argument-on-whether-271f-applies-to-method-claims/2009-06-04T14:30:34+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/04/gsks-petition-for-rehearing-in-tafas-v-doll/2009-06-04T14:10:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/04/tafas-requests-rehearing-en-banc-in-pto-rules-case/2009-06-04T13:36:47+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/01/update-supreme-court-grants-cert-in-bilski/2011-01-06T06:38:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/06/01/no-news-on-new-pto-director-yet/2009-07-09T23:56:56+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/28/president-obama-nominates-judge-sonia-sotomayor-to-supreme-court/2011-09-13T02:25:48+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/19/federal-circuit-clarifies-interpretation-of-product-by-process-claims/2009-05-19T14:41:31+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/18/aclu-files-suit-against-gene-patents/2009-05-20T09:18:47+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/18/patent-reform-update/2009-05-18T14:34:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/13/pto-publishes-rules-agenda-for-2009/2009-05-14T12:47:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/11/justice-souter-to-retire-from-supreme-court/2009-05-11T16:26:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/05/who-will-be-the-next-director-of-the-pto/2010-03-18T21:09:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/05/pto-files-brief-opposing-cert-in-bilski/2009-05-05T14:08:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/2011-09-25T00:21:27+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/30/house-judiciary-committee-takes-up-patent-reform/2009-04-30T12:50:16+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/24/tafas-v-doll-request-for-extension-of-time/2009-04-24T13:11:40+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/21/what-should-you-do-if-you-have-a-new-idea-or-invention/2009-04-23T06:53:42+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/14/district-court-applies-bilski-even-more-broadly/2009-12-24T12:08:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/13/update-on-patent-filing-numbers/2009-04-13T17:28:44+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/02/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-bill/2009-04-10T18:57:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/01/update-text-of-patent-reform-bill/2009-04-01T21:06:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/04/01/senate-judiciary-committee-close-to-agreement-on-patent-reform/2009-04-01T18:07:20+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/31/more-ways-for-inventors-to-reduce-the-cost-of-patenting-and-get-a-better-patent-application/2009-04-15T10:01:26+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/25/allowance-rates-continue-to-drop/2009-03-25T14:21:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/25/patent-filings-down-more-significantly-than-previously-thought/2009-03-25T13:14:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/24/implications-of-pto-rules-decision/2009-03-24T13:26:08+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/23/orrin-hatch-on-patent-reform/2009-03-23T19:43:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/23/pto-budget-shortfall-could-have-profound-effect-on-patent-system/2009-04-15T10:12:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/20/federal-circuit-decides-appeal-of-pto-rules/2009-04-15T11:58:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/20/update-leahy-delays-action-on-patent-reform-bill/2009-03-20T14:08:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/19/federal-circuit-provides-guidance-on-patent-drafting/2009-03-19T18:05:14+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/19/judge-linn-calls-for-en-banc-review-of-the-standard-for-inequitable-conduct/2009-04-15T16:09:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/19/update-senate-committee-to-vote-on-gov-lockes-confirmation/2009-03-19T17:18:18+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/19/patent-reform-debate-has-a-sense-of-deja-vu/2009-03-25T20:04:35+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/16/lawmakers-request-additional-time-to-debate-patent-reform/2009-03-16T15:37:32+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/11/senate-patent-reform-hearing-focuses-on-damages/2009-03-11T17:15:58+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/11/federal-circuit-issues-expansive-reading-of-bilski/2009-03-11T17:15:18+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/11/entire-federal-circuit-to-decide-if-271f-applies-to-method-claims/2009-03-11T16:47:55+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/11/update-deferred-examination/2009-03-11T12:46:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/06/specter-urges-leahy-to-delay-action-on-patent-reform-bill/2009-03-06T15:55:03+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/06/amicus-briefs-filed-in-support-of-bilski/2009-03-06T15:50:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/04/patent-reform-bills-introduced/2009-03-04T19:06:34+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/03/02/foreign-patent-protection/2011-05-17T12:29:33+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/24/update-ip-deferred-examination-roundtable/2009-02-24T16:34:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/24/obama-to-nominate-gary-locke-for-commerce-secretary/2009-02-24T16:11:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/20/ftc-conducts-hearings-on-the-evolving-ip-marketplace/2009-02-20T16:50:02+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/17/pto-roundtable-finds-support-for-deferred-examination/2009-02-17T16:14:55+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/17/pto-considering-significant-increase-in-rce-fee/2009-02-17T16:03:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/12/sen-gregg-withdraws-as-commerce-nominee/2009-02-12T22:14:10+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/11/patent-reform-2009-continued/2009-02-11T15:55:52+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/10/patent-reform-2009/2009-02-10T14:58:15+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/09/federal-circuit-caseload/2009-02-09T17:31:07+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/05/wipo-announces-slowdown-in-pct-applications-in-2008/2009-02-05T16:33:08+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/05/reaction-to-sen-greggs-nomination/2009-02-05T16:15:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/02/03/judd-gregg-to-be-nominated-as-commerce-secretary/2009-02-03T20:50:25+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/21/the-importance-of-an-agreement-prior-to-inventing/2009-03-14T12:37:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/29/pto-to-consider-deferred-examination/2009-01-29T16:04:46+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/29/cert-petition-filed-in-bilski/2009-01-29T15:55:19+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/28/john-w-thompson-is-leading-candidate-for-commerce-secretary/2009-01-28T16:27:23+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/26/congress-tries-again-on-district-judge-pilot-program/2009-01-26T16:36:38+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/26/pto-problems-are-not-new-the-more-things-change-the-more-they-stay-the-same/2009-01-26T16:34:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/23/aipla-urges-federal-circuit-not-to-proscribe-patents-for-biomedical-diagnostic-tools/2009-01-26T21:38:02+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/16/patent-reform-legislation-on-damages-may-hurt-patents-and-the-economy/2009-01-16T20:35:50+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/15/non-us-companies-obtain-majority-of-us-patents/2009-01-15T18:06:32+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/13/comiskey-at-the-federal-circuit-rehearing-en-banc-denied/2009-01-13T19:29:41+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/12/congress-continues-to-sabotage-federal-judiciary/2010-04-26T05:08:01+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/08/developing-and-preserving-evidence-of-conception/2009-01-08T15:54:24+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/07/jon-dudas-to-resign-as-director-of-pto/2009-01-07T19:18:11+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2009/01/06/can-accused-infringers-finally-escape-marshall/2009-01-06T13:39:37+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/20/does-the-federal-circuit-need-a-fresh-viewpoint/2008-12-20T21:11:30+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/19/federal-circuit-rejects-metabolite-type-claim/2009-04-15T14:33:00+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/17/whats-a-small-entity/2009-06-11T09:49:05+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/16/is-the-patent-office-against-patent-applicants/2008-12-16T22:24:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/15/patent-allowance-rate-continues-to-drop/2009-03-25T02:23:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/12/chief-judge-michel-questions-post-grant-opposition-proceedings/2008-12-15T14:31:53+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/08/lower-standard-applies-for-indefiniteness-rejection-during-prosecution/2008-12-15T14:23:06+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/11/patent-pending/2008-12-11T20:02:21+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/10/should-you-file-a-provisional-application-or-a-regular-patent-application/2008-12-10T18:39:22+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/about/2010-03-31T08:03:27+00:00weekly0.6http://inventivestep.net/2008/12/05/tafas-v-dudas-update/2008-12-05T21:17:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/05/bpai-decision-applying-bilski/2008-12-05T21:14:58+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/05/are-business-method-patents-going-down-the-toilet/2008-12-05T19:59:09+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/03/federal-circuit-argument-on-pto-rules-set-for-friday/2008-12-05T14:31:36+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/2008/12/04/p-pac-annual-report-calls-for-significant-reduction-in-patent-pendency/2009-12-31T08:57:17+00:00monthlyhttp://inventivestep.net/daily1.02012-01-31T15:29:21+00:00