<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court to Review Patent Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2012/10/09/supreme-court-to-review-patent-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/10/09/supreme-court-to-review-patent-cases/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court Affirms Federal Circuit in Seed Patent Exhaustion Case &#124; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/10/09/supreme-court-to-review-patent-cases/#comment-20504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supreme Court Affirms Federal Circuit in Seed Patent Exhaustion Case &#124; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3063#comment-20504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] details are available in my preview post for the Supreme Court&#8217;s current [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] details are available in my preview post for the Supreme Court&#8217;s current [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Malpractice Cases Belong in State Court &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/10/09/supreme-court-to-review-patent-cases/#comment-18724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patent Malpractice Cases Belong in State Court &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3063#comment-18724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this case, the Texas Supreme Court had followed the Federal Circuit&#8217;s rule and dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  The Federal Circuit&#8217;s rule [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this case, the Texas Supreme Court had followed the Federal Circuit&#8217;s rule and dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  The Federal Circuit&#8217;s rule [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Week in Review 10 Oct 2012 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/10/09/supreme-court-to-review-patent-cases/#comment-16798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Week in Review 10 Oct 2012 from IP Think Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3063#comment-16798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Self replicating (and alive) inventions: US Supreme Court grants certiorari in Monsanto v. Bowman (Patently-O) (Holman&#8217;s Biotech Blog) (Inventive Step) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Self replicating (and alive) inventions: US Supreme Court grants certiorari in Monsanto v. Bowman (Patently-O) (Holman&#8217;s Biotech Blog) (Inventive Step) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOW TO &#8220;FIX&#8221; THE &#8220;BROKEN&#8221; PATENT SYSTEM FOR CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY!!! &#124; ERIC.fm</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/10/09/supreme-court-to-review-patent-cases/#comment-16779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HOW TO &#8220;FIX&#8221; THE &#8220;BROKEN&#8221; PATENT SYSTEM FOR CONSUMER TECHNOLOGY!!! &#124; ERIC.fm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3063#comment-16779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Supreme Court to Review Patent Cases (inventivestep.net)  Share ERIC.fm:TwitterFacebookPinterestMoreTumblrStumbleUponLinkedInRedditDiggPrintEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.    Posted in Apple Devices, Eric&#039;s 2-Cents, Lawsuits, Patents &amp; IP, Samsung Devices, TECHNOLOGY [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supreme Court to Review Patent Cases (inventivestep.net)  Share ERIC.fm:TwitterFacebookPinterestMoreTumblrStumbleUponLinkedInRedditDiggPrintEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this.    Posted in Apple Devices, Eric&#039;s 2-Cents, Lawsuits, Patents &amp; IP, Samsung Devices, TECHNOLOGY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
