<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitutionality of First-to-File Challenged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2012/09/04/constitutionality-of-first-to-file-challenged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/09/04/constitutionality-of-first-to-file-challenged/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey August</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/09/04/constitutionality-of-first-to-file-challenged/#comment-18852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey August]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3022#comment-18852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I trust the originalists on the Supreme Court will have no problem in equating &quot;inventor&quot; to the one who FIRST invents. 

If, of course, this case gets there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I trust the originalists on the Supreme Court will have no problem in equating &#8220;inventor&#8221; to the one who FIRST invents. </p>
<p>If, of course, this case gets there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Week in Review 5 Sept 2012 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/09/04/constitutionality-of-first-to-file-challenged/#comment-16187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Week in Review 5 Sept 2012 from IP Think Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3022#comment-16187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Madstad Engineering – Madstad and Mark Stadnyk sue USPTO alleging move to first-to-file regime violates Constitution (Inventive Step) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Madstad Engineering – Madstad and Mark Stadnyk sue USPTO alleging move to first-to-file regime violates Constitution (Inventive Step) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
