<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Wins $1.05 Billion Verdict Against Samsung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/27/apple-wins-1-05-billion-verdict-against-samsung/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/27/apple-wins-1-05-billion-verdict-against-samsung/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Patents &#124; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/27/apple-wins-1-05-billion-verdict-against-samsung/#comment-20334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Design Patents &#124; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3002#comment-20334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple&#8217;s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple&#8217;s design [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple&#8217;s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple&#8217;s design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Patent Considerations &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/27/apple-wins-1-05-billion-verdict-against-samsung/#comment-16951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Design Patent Considerations &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3002#comment-16951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple&#8217;s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple&#8217;s design [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple&#8217;s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple&#8217;s design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventive step &#124; Platformblog</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/27/apple-wins-1-05-billion-verdict-against-samsung/#comment-16124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inventive step &#124; Platformblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3002#comment-16124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Apple Wins $1.05 Billion Verdict Against Samsung « INVENTIVE STEP [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Wins $1.05 Billion Verdict Against Samsung « INVENTIVE STEP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Week in Review 29 August 2012 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/27/apple-wins-1-05-billion-verdict-against-samsung/#comment-16023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Week in Review 29 August 2012 from IP Think Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=3002#comment-16023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Patents) (Patentology) (Spicy IP) (IPKat) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (EFF) (Patents Post-Grant) (Inventive Step) (Docket [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patents) (Patentology) (Spicy IP) (IPKat) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (EFF) (Patents Post-Grant) (Inventive Step) (Docket [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
