Apple Wins $1.05 Billion Verdict Against Samsung

Last week, a jury in the Northern District of Calfornia found that Samsung willfully infringed a number of Apple’s patents in the ongoing mobile phone wars.  The jury also found that Samsung infringed Apple’s trade dress in some of its phones.  The jury awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.  Samsung had countersued Apple for infringement of its own patents.  The jury found that Apple did not infringe Samsung’s patents.

At this point, the win seems rather complete for Apple in the case.  The district court will next entertain post-trial motions related to an injunction against future infringement by Samsung, as well as Samsung’s motions to overturn the jury verdict or obtain a new trial.  A hearing on injunctive relief is scheduled for September 20.

As expected, Apple praised the verdict in its press release, while Samsung indicated it would continue to fight the case in court.  Samsung characterized the verdict as a loss for consumers. 

The companies are litigating not only in the US, but in other countries as well.  A South Korean court had earlier decided that both companies infringed each other’s patents.

Patently-O has a good summary of the verdict including the jury verdict form.  Further coverage fo the case is also available here.

About these ads

6 Responses to “Apple Wins $1.05 Billion Verdict Against Samsung”

  1. Global Week in Review 29 August 2012 from IP Think Tank Says:

    […] Patents) (Patentology) (Spicy IP) (IPKat) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (EFF) (Patents Post-Grant) (Inventive Step) (Docket […]

  2. Inventive step | Platformblog Says:

    […] Apple Wins $1.05 Billion Verdict Against Samsung « INVENTIVE STEP […]

  3. Design Patent Considerations « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    […] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple’s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple’s design […]

  4. Design Patents | INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    […] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple’s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple’s design […]

  5. Design Patents | INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    […] patents get all of the publicity in when discussing innovation.  This could be changing with Apple’s $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung, which was based in large part on infringement of Apple’s design […]

  6. Global Week in Review 29 August 2012 from IP Think Tank | Duncan Bucknell Says:

    […] Patents) (Patentology) (Spicy IP) (IPKat) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (EFF) (Patents Post-Grant) (Inventive Step) (Docket […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers

%d bloggers like this: