<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHIELD Act Introduced in House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/07/shield-act-introduced-in-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/07/shield-act-introduced-in-house/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New SHIELD Bill Introduced in House &#124; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/07/shield-act-introduced-in-house/#comment-18841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New SHIELD Bill Introduced in House &#124; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2973#comment-18841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] year, several members of Congress sought to limit patent infringement suits concerning computer hardware a....  If the suit did not have a &#8220;reasonable likelihood of succeeding,&#8221; the losing party [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, several members of Congress sought to limit patent infringement suits concerning computer hardware a&#8230;.  If the suit did not have a &#8220;reasonable likelihood of succeeding,&#8221; the losing party [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventive step &#124; Platformblog</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/07/shield-act-introduced-in-house/#comment-16126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inventive step &#124; Platformblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2973#comment-16126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] SHIELD Act Introduced in House « INVENTIVE STEP [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SHIELD Act Introduced in House « INVENTIVE STEP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Week in Review 8 August 2012 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/08/07/shield-act-introduced-in-house/#comment-15776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Week in Review 8 August 2012 from IP Think Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2973#comment-15776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act (SHIELD Act) introduced in House of Representatives (Inventive Step) (Patentology) (EFF) (Ars Technica) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act (SHIELD Act) introduced in House of Representatives (Inventive Step) (Patentology) (EFF) (Ars Technica) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
