<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Circuit Rules Computer-Related Claims to be Patentable Subject Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2012/07/09/federal-circuit-rules-computer-related-claims-to-be-patentable-subject-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/07/09/federal-circuit-rules-computer-related-claims-to-be-patentable-subject-matter/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:21:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Circuit En Banc on Patentable Subject Matter &#124; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/07/09/federal-circuit-rules-computer-related-claims-to-be-patentable-subject-matter/#comment-20468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federal Circuit En Banc on Patentable Subject Matter &#124; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2922#comment-20468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Federal Circuit panel had reversed a district court opinion that related to patent eligibility of computer-related claims.  The details of the patent are [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Federal Circuit panel had reversed a district court opinion that related to patent eligibility of computer-related claims.  The details of the patent are [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Circuit to Consider Patent Eligibility of Computer-Related Inventions En Banc &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/07/09/federal-circuit-rules-computer-related-claims-to-be-patentable-subject-matter/#comment-16797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federal Circuit to Consider Patent Eligibility of Computer-Related Inventions En Banc &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2922#comment-16797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Federal Circuit panel held a large number of patent claims directed to a computer-related invention to be eligible subject matter under § 101 of the Patent Act.  The court performed a claim construction analysis on the various limitations [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federal Circuit panel held a large number of patent claims directed to a computer-related invention to be eligible subject matter under § 101 of the Patent Act.  The court performed a claim construction analysis on the various limitations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Global Week in Review 13 July 2012 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/07/09/federal-circuit-rules-computer-related-claims-to-be-patentable-subject-matter/#comment-15450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Online Global Week in Review 13 July 2012 from IP Think Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 06:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2922#comment-15450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rules computer-related claims to be patentable subject matter: CLS Bank v Alice (Inventive Step) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rules computer-related claims to be patentable subject matter: CLS Bank v Alice (Inventive Step) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee Marie Jones</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2012/07/09/federal-circuit-rules-computer-related-claims-to-be-patentable-subject-matter/#comment-15376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renee Marie Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=2922#comment-15376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is sick.  The judges on CAFC are nuts.  Read the claims.  Not a single one includes anything that can legally be patented. Aparrently the CAFC thinks that patents should be granted to anyone who can spew spew enough meaningless goggledegook.  I guess they all think they are all so smart that if they can&#039;t understand it, then it must be deep, important, and worthy of a government sponsored monopoly?  Egad.  The only think sicker than the corrupt CAFC is the companies that take advantage of them to get undeserved patent grants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sick.  The judges on CAFC are nuts.  Read the claims.  Not a single one includes anything that can legally be patented. Aparrently the CAFC thinks that patents should be granted to anyone who can spew spew enough meaningless goggledegook.  I guess they all think they are all so smart that if they can&#8217;t understand it, then it must be deep, important, and worthy of a government sponsored monopoly?  Egad.  The only think sicker than the corrupt CAFC is the companies that take advantage of them to get undeserved patent grants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
