New BPAI Rules Raised Again

Several weeks ago, the PTO published a notice in the Federal Register regarding the previously delayed final rules regarding procedures at the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI).

Many of the most controversial provisions of the previously proposed rules have been changed or deleted.  Specifically, the Notice refers to deleting many of the highly technical requirements that would have added significantly to the cost of filing an appeal brief.  The portions of the rule that would have required that briefs and other papers contain specific headings, that they be filed in specific fonts, that they not exceed a certain page limit, and that they include a glossary of terms for the Board have been deleted.  The requirement that the appellant identify which arguments were presented to the examiner and which are new arguments has also been deleted.

The rules as now proposed would also affect an examiner’s conduct.  The rules would continue to permit new grounds of rejection to be raised in examiner’s answers and also would no longer permit a supplemental examiner’s answer to a reply brief by the appellant.

The Notice cites as the purpose of the rules to “efficiently frame any dispute” between the appellant and the examiner and “to provide the best opportunity for resolution of the dispute without the necessity of proceeding with the appeal.”  Hopefully this means that fewer cases will get to the Board because more of them will be remanded to the examiner to correct poor rejections or issue allowances.

There are still a number of technical requirements being added to appeal brief requirements, including those relating to providing specific specification and drawing support for each claim on appeal.  In general, the worst requirements will be deleted.

The BPAI does need to take steps to reduce the crazy situation involving an appeal docket that is growing at an exponential pace.  It is difficult to tell how much effect these rules would have on that situation.

The Notice refers to a roundtable discussion concerning the rules that the PTO will conduct on January 20.  The PTO solicits public comments on the new rules until February 12 and hopes that the timing of the Roundtable will permit comments before and after that event.  This should permit a more complete public participation than prior PTO procedures have.

It is quite refreshing that the new administration is seeking to work with the patent community in crafting new rules and solutions to its problems, rather than working against them.

About these ads

8 Responses to “New BPAI Rules Raised Again”

  1. Seo Says:

    Good Article. I agree with your point. Regards, Seo

  2. Relationship Healing Says:

    Hello. This is kind of an “unconventional” question , but have other visitors asked you how get the menu bar to look like you’ve got it? I also have a blog and am really looking to alter around the theme, however am scared to death to mess with it for fear of the search engines punishing me. I am very new to all of this …so i am just not positive exactly how to try to to it all yet. I’ll just keep working on it one day at a time Thanks for any help you can offer here.

  3. PTO BPAI Roundtable « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    […] is reporting on the BPAI Roundtable held on January 20.  The primary discussion concerned the new appeal brief rules.  PTO Deputy Director Sharon Barner and the BPAI’s Chief Administrative Patent Judge Michael […]

  4. Chadwick Lawrence Says:

    Thanks for saying so, i need some time to think about this. I need some time to think about this

  5. Farmville Facebook Says:

    Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!

  6. Erma Carthon Says:

    Thanks for the great article. Is this a wordpress site? I like that platform, really nice.

  7. PTO Proposes New Appeal Rules « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    […] The good news is that the new Federal Register notice indicates that the previous controversial and highly technical rules proposed by the last administration at the PTO have officially been rescinded.  Instead, the PTO is seeking to implement rules that […]

  8. Karole Mckendry Says:

    This is just my very first stop by at your website. I stumbled upon quite a few great posts throughout your website! Considering the hundreds of comments on your pages, I suppose we are not the only person having all of the fun here! Carry on all the solid work!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers

%d bloggers like this: