<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Patent Act Include a Written Description Requirement Separate From the Enablement Requirement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2009/12/07/does-the-patent-act-include-a-written-description-requirement-separate-from-the-enablement-requirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/12/07/does-the-patent-act-include-a-written-description-requirement-separate-from-the-enablement-requirement/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Circuit Holds That Patent Act Includes Separate Written Description Requirement &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/12/07/does-the-patent-act-include-a-written-description-requirement-separate-from-the-enablement-requirement/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federal Circuit Holds That Patent Act Includes Separate Written Description Requirement &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=1280#comment-1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As noted previously, the statute as written is not a model of clarity and has been subject to multiple interpretations. The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As noted previously, the statute as written is not a model of clarity and has been subject to multiple interpretations. The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pharmacy tech</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/12/07/does-the-patent-act-include-a-written-description-requirement-separate-from-the-enablement-requirement/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pharmacy tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=1280#comment-787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep posting stuff like this i really like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep posting stuff like this i really like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

