<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Circuit Reverses Invalidity of Method of Calibrating Drug Dosages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2009/09/17/federal-circuit-reverses-invalidity-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/09/17/federal-circuit-reverses-invalidity-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Circuit Reconfirms Patentability of Method of Calibrating Drug Dosages &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/09/17/federal-circuit-reverses-invalidity-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/#comment-6495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federal Circuit Reconfirms Patentability of Method of Calibrating Drug Dosages &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=1099#comment-6495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] By Matt Osenga  Last year, prior to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Bilski v. Kappos, the Federal Circuit reversed a district court holding that Prometheus&#8217;s claims to methods of calibrating drug dosages were [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By Matt Osenga  Last year, prior to the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Bilski v. Kappos, the Federal Circuit reversed a district court holding that Prometheus&#8217;s claims to methods of calibrating drug dosages were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilski Reaction &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/09/17/federal-circuit-reverses-invalidity-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/#comment-3263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilski Reaction &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=1099#comment-3263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Federal Circuit had previously reversed a district court ruling in this case that a method of calibrating drug dosages was not patentable subject matter.  The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federal Circuit had previously reversed a district court ruling in this case that a method of calibrating drug dosages was not patentable subject matter.  The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayo Asks Supreme Court to Review Another Patentable Subject Matter Case &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/09/17/federal-circuit-reverses-invalidity-of-method-of-calibrating-drug-dosages/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayo Asks Supreme Court to Review Another Patentable Subject Matter Case &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=1099#comment-695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mayo Asks Supreme Court to Review Another Patentable Subject Matter&#160;Case  The Mayo Clinic has filed a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court asking them to review the Federal Circuit&#8217;s decision in Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mayo Asks Supreme Court to Review Another Patentable Subject Matter&nbsp;Case  The Mayo Clinic has filed a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court asking them to review the Federal Circuit&#8217;s decision in Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

