PPAC Meeting Summary

The 271 Patent Blog has a good summary of the recent Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC) meeting at the PTO.  Recall that PPAC was created to advise the Director of the PTO on management of patent operations in the Office.

Several notable items were discussed:

The PTO is experiencing a 7% decrease in patent filings that has resulted in a $140 million budget shortfall.  A portion of this amount ($110 million) has been cut from the budget by the hiring freeze.

The optimism earlier this year about Patent Reform legislation is dwindling and prospects for passage appear unlikely in this session of Congress.

Marc Adler, Acting Deputy Director for Patent Examination Policy, and Peggy Focarino, Acting Commissioner for Patents, discussed a number of issues as well.

There was a great deal of discussion of improving patent quality.  First, the PTO realizes that patent quality needs to be defined to include application quality, search and examination quality, and prosecution quality.  Compliance with § 112′s written description and enablement requirements is a key to improving quality.

Examiners need additional training on how to conduct interviews with applicants to advance prosecution.  Examiners need to work to reduce the number of unnecessary continuing applications by not issuing premature final rejections.  The current system that provides incentives to examiners for continuing applications needs to be revised to instead provide examiners with disincentives for continuation filings.  Finally, examiners need training on how to shorten prosecution by issuing high quality initial Office Actions.

These sound like great initiatives by the PTO.  I and others have argued that better enforcement of § 112 (and §§ 102 and 103) would render decisions like Bilski unnecessary.  Further, I have seen way too many second and subsequent non-final Office Actions where the examiner simply does a new search and finds new prior art after the first Office Action.  This creates unnecessary delay in prosecution and increases the cost for applicants to continue to respond to these Office Actions.  The initial Office Action should include all pertinent rejections up front.  Finally, incentivizing examiners by giving additional “counts” for continuations and RCEs is in direct contradiction to the PTO’s attempts to reduce or get rid of these filings with the new rules.

About these ads

2 Responses to “PPAC Meeting Summary”

  1. Congress Attempts to Aid PTO in its Budget Crisis « Inventive Step Says:

    [...] Congress Attempts to Aid PTO in its Budget Crisis The National Journal and Reuters are reporting that Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Jeff Sessions (R-AL) have introduced a bill to permit the PTO to use the $60-70 million surplus of funds on the trademark side of the office in an effort to alleviate the budget crisis on the patent side.  By statute, the PTO has to keep its operations and revenue separate for patent and trademark  activities.  While the trademark side of the PTO is operating at a budget surplus, the patent side is facing a financial disaster due to decreased filings. [...]

  2. House Passes Bill Shifting PTO Revenue « INVENTIVE STEP Says:

    [...] that the money has to come from somewhere, but the PTO’s budget crisis is a result of a significant decrease in filings.  Much of this is the result of the economy, but it is also a result of the PTO’s [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers

%d bloggers like this: