<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Panel Not Going to &#8220;Rubber Stamp&#8221; Senate Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lotDerseext</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/#comment-10465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lotDerseext]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=740#comment-10465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man .. Excellent .. Superb .. I&#039;ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionallyI&#039;m satisfied to search out numerous helpful information here within the submit, we want develop extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man .. Excellent .. Superb .. I&#8217;ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionallyI&#8217;m satisfied to search out numerous helpful information here within the submit, we want develop extra strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Reform Not Dead Yet &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patent Reform Not Dead Yet &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=740#comment-4186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Even if the bill does get to the Senate floor and even if it passes the Senate, it still has to be passed by the House.  The House Judiciary Committee has not voted on the bill and seemed disinclined to do so last year. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even if the bill does get to the Senate floor and even if it passes the Senate, it still has to be passed by the House.  The House Judiciary Committee has not voted on the bill and seemed disinclined to do so last year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Releases &#8220;Manager&#8217;s Amendment&#8221; on Patent Reform &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senate Releases &#8220;Manager&#8217;s Amendment&#8221; on Patent Reform &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=740#comment-953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What is much less certain is what might happen to the bill in the House.  The House seemed less than thrilled with the Senate bill during its hearings last [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is much less certain is what might happen to the bill in the House.  The House seemed less than thrilled with the Senate bill during its hearings last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markez linda</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markez linda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=740#comment-353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. Were did you got all the information from... :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Were did you got all the information from&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/05/01/house-panel-not-going-to-rubber-stamp-senate-bill/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Earnhardt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 04:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=740#comment-255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blog on patent reform from Mark Chandler, SVP and General Counsel, Cisco.  He testified at this hearing:
http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/americas_continued_lead_in_innovation_requires_fixes_to_flaws_in_patent_sys/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog on patent reform from Mark Chandler, SVP and General Counsel, Cisco.  He testified at this hearing:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/americas_continued_lead_in_innovation_requires_fixes_to_flaws_in_patent_sys/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/americas_continued_lead_in_innovation_requires_fixes_to_flaws_in_patent_sys/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

