<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Judiciary Committee Close to Agreement on Patent Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2009/04/01/senate-judiciary-committee-close-to-agreement-on-patent-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/04/01/senate-judiciary-committee-close-to-agreement-on-patent-reform/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Companies Express Concerns with Post-Grant Opposition &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/04/01/senate-judiciary-committee-close-to-agreement-on-patent-reform/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Companies Express Concerns with Post-Grant Opposition &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=697#comment-634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] companies praised the compromise that was reached on the damages issue and requested that Secretary Locke work with Congress to improve the post-grant opposition and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] companies praised the compromise that was reached on the damages issue and requested that Secretary Locke work with Congress to improve the post-grant opposition and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTO Inter Partes Reexamination May Give Insight on Post-Grant Oppositions &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/04/01/senate-judiciary-committee-close-to-agreement-on-patent-reform/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PTO Inter Partes Reexamination May Give Insight on Post-Grant Oppositions &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=697#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] patentability.  The PTO is granting 94% of requests for reexamination under this standard.  The Senate bill includes a different standard for post-grant opposition requests&#8211;an &#8220;interesting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] patentability.  The PTO is granting 94% of requests for reexamination under this standard.  The Senate bill includes a different standard for post-grant opposition requests&#8211;an &#8220;interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

