<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PTO to Consider Deferred Examination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inventivestep.net/2009/01/29/pto-to-consider-deferred-examination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/01/29/pto-to-consider-deferred-examination/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to a discussion of patent law issues and strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reducing Patent Pendency &#171; INVENTIVE STEP</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/01/29/pto-to-consider-deferred-examination/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reducing Patent Pendency &#171; INVENTIVE STEP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=425#comment-1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February 2009, the PTO held a roundtable discussion to determine whether there was support for a system of deferred examination.  The general [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 2009, the PTO held a roundtable discussion to determine whether there was support for a system of deferred examination.  The general [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTO Roundtable Finds Support for Deferred Examination &#171; Inventive Step</title>
		<link>http://inventivestep.net/2009/01/29/pto-to-consider-deferred-examination/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PTO Roundtable Finds Support for Deferred Examination &#171; Inventive Step]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inventivestep.net/?p=425#comment-85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my previous post, I laid out many of the arguments for and against deferred examination.  Much of the discussion at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my previous post, I laid out many of the arguments for and against deferred examination.  Much of the discussion at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

